Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Risk indicators related to peri-implant disease: an observational retrospective cohort study

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 46±Ç 4È£ p.266 ~ 276
Poli Pier Paolo, Beretta Mario, Grossi Giovanni Battista, Maiorana Carlo,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Poli Pier Paolo ) - University of Milan IRCCS Ca Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit
 ( Beretta Mario ) - University of Milan IRCCS Ca Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit
 ( Grossi Giovanni Battista ) - University of Milan IRCCS Ca Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit
 ( Maiorana Carlo ) - University of Milan IRCCS Ca Granda Foundation Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the influence of potential risk indicators on the development of peri-implant disease.

Methods: Overall, 103 patients referred for implant treatment from 2000 to 2012 were randomly enrolled. The study sample consisted of 421 conventional-length (>6 mm) non-turned titanium implants that were evaluated clinically and radiographically according to pre-established clinical and patient-related parameters by a single investigator. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis rank test and a logistic regression model were used for the statistical analysis of the recorded data at the implant level.

Results: The diagnosis of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis was made for 173 (41.1%) and 19 (4.5%) implants, respectively. Age (¡Ã65 years), patient adherence (professional hygiene recalls <2/year) and the presence of plaque were associated with higher peri-implant probing-depth values and bleeding-on-probing scores. The logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P=0.001), patient adherence (P=0.03), the absence of keratinized tissue (P=0.03), implants placed in pristine bone (P=0.04), and the presence of peri-implant soft-tissue recession (P=0.000) were strongly associated with the event of peri-implantitis.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, patients aged ¡Ã65 years and non-adherent subjects were more prone to develop peri-implant disease. Therefore, early diagnosis and a systematic maintenance-care program are essential for maintaining peri-implant tissue health, especially in older patients.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implants; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Periodontal diseases; Peri-implantitis; Retrospective study; Risk factors

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI